ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2024
Enhanced Commendable Sensitivity and Specificity for MSI in Colorectal Cancer by a New PCR-HRM Based 8-Loci MSI Assay.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the performance of the PCR-HRM assay by comparing it with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and the PCR capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) methods.
resultsA total of 224 patients with colorectal cancer participated in the study, with nearly half having mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) tissues and the remainder possessing pMMR tissues. There was a 97.77% concordance between the PCR-HRM assay and IHC, and a 97.56% concordance between PCR-HRM and the PCR-CE assay. In comparison with IHC for dMMR proteins, the PCR-HRM demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.36% and a specificity of 99.12%. When juxtaposed with the PCR-CE assay, its sensitivity was 98.96% and specificity stood at 96.33%. The mutations observed in the microsatellite loci were uniformly distributed across all eight loci. Discrepant outcomes were more frequent in instances of MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency. Furthermore, the germline mutation status of MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6 in 62 patients was ascertained using next-generation sequencing. All patients displaying MMR gene pathogenic mutations (N = 14) were identified as MSI-H by PCR-HRM, whereas those with MSS tissues (N = 43) did not exhibit MMR gene pathogenic mutations. Thus, the PCR-HRM method proficiently pinpoints tumors with verified germline MMR mutations, indicative of Lynch syndrome.
conclusionConclusively, the PCR-HRM assay emerges as a swift and congruent diagnostic tool for microsatellite instability, boasting commendable sensitivity and specificity in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.