Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132861›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2025

Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review.

Chris Major Ncho, Janine I Berdos, Vaishali Gupta, Attaur Rahman, Kefala Taye Mekonnen, Allah Bakhsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Curcumin AttenuatesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris Major NchoDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-6730
Janine I BerdosDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Forestry, Tarlac Agricultural University, Malacampa, Tarlac, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9694-6145
Vaishali GuptaDivision of Applied Life Sciences (BK21 Four Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-5246
Attaur RahmanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kefala Taye MekonnenDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Arsi University, Asella, Oromia, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-7337
Allah BakhshAtta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern animal husbandry, stress can be viewed as an automatic response triggered by exposure to adverse environmental conditions. This response can range from mild discomfort to severe consequences, including mortality. The poultry industry, which significantly contributes to human nutrition, is not exempt from this issue. Although genetic selection has been employed for several decades to enhance production output, it has also resulted in poor stress resilience. Stress is manifested through a series of physiological reactions, such as the identification of the stressful stimulus, activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the adrenal medulla, and subsequent hormonal cascades. While brief periods of stress can be tolerated, prolonged exposure can have more severe consequences. For instance, extreme fluctuations in environmental temperature can lead to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, impairment of reproductive performance, and reduced immunity. In addition, excessive noise in poultry slaughterhouses has been linked to altered bird behaviour and decreased production efficiency. Mechanical vibrations have also been shown to negatively impact the meat quality of broilers during transport as well as the egg quality and hatchability in hatcheries. Lastly, egg production is heavily influenced by light intensity and regimens, and inadequate light management can result in deficiencies, including visual anomalies, skeletal deformities, and circulatory problems. Although there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the impact of environmental stressors on poultry physiology, there is a disproportionate representation of stressors in research. Recent studies have been focused on chronic heat stress, reflecting the current interest of the scientific community in climate change. Therefore, this review aims to highlight the major abiotic stressors in poultry production and elucidate their underlying mechanisms, addressing the need for a more comprehensive understanding of stress in diverse environmental contexts.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryPoultryStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsPoultry Diseaseschickencold stressduckheat stresslightnoisevibrationwelfare

Identifiers

PMID39132861
PMCPMC11731476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.