ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025
Persistence of an Infectious Form of SARS-CoV-2 After Protease Inhibitor Treatment of Permissive Cells In Vitro.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential Optimization Approach Toward an Azapeptide-Based SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitor.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Article
- Incidence of COVID-19 Symptom Rebound After Treatment with Remdesivir.Infectious disease reports · 2025Article
- Modeling suggests SARS-CoV-2 rebound after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment is driven by target cell preservation coupled with incomplete viral clearance.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Modeling suggests SARS-CoV-2 rebound after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment is driven by target cell preservation coupled with incomplete viral clearance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- COVID-19 therapeutics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reports have described severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rebound in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients treated with nirmatrelvir, a 3CL protease inhibitor. The cause remains a mystery, although drug resistance, reinfection, and lack of adequate immune responses have been excluded. We now present virologic findings that provide a clue to the cause of viral rebound, which occurs in approximately 20% of the treated cases. Persistence of infectious SARS-CoV-2 was experimentally documented in vitro after treatment with nirmatrelvir or another 3CL protease inhibitor, but not with a polymerase inhibitor, remdesivir. This infectious form decayed slowly with a half-life of approximately 1 day, suggesting that its persistence could outlive the treatment course to reignite SARS-CoV-2 infection as the drug is eliminated. Notably, extending nirmatrelvir treatment beyond 8 days abolished viral rebound in vitro. Our findings point in a particular direction for future investigation of virus persistence and offer a specific treatment recommendation that should be tested clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.