Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132617›Full record

ArticleGastro hep advances2023

Candidate Screening for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinic by Fib-4 Index From Subclinical Subjects.

Chisato Okamoto, Osamu Tsukamoto, Takuya Hasegawa, Tatsuro Hitsumoto, Ken Matsuoka, Makoto Amaki, Hideaki Kanzaki, Chisato Izumi, Seiji Takashima, Shin Ito and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastro hep advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chisato OkamotoDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Osamu TsukamotoDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya HasegawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Garatia Hospital, Mino, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuro HitsumotoDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Ken MatsuokaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto AmakiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Development, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hideaki KanzakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Chisato IzumiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Seiji TakashimaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Shin ItoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Development, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masafumi KitakazeDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Recognition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at an early stage in mass screening is desirable, but difficult to achieve. We examined whether the fibrosis (Fib)-4 index, a simple index of liver stiffness/fibrosis, could be used as a screening tool to select candidates requiring expert diagnostics. Methods: Individuals who participated in annual health checks between 2006 and 2007 in Arita-cho, Saga, Japan, with no history of cardiovascular disease and EF ≥ 50% were enrolled (total 710; 258 men; median age, 59 years). Results: Participants were divided into 5 groups according to HFpEF risk: 215 (30%), 100 (14%), 171 (24%), 163 (23%), and 61 (9%) with Heart Failure Association (HFA)-PEFF scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-6 points, respectively. The highest HFpEF risk group (HFA-PEFF score, 4-6 points) showed poor prognosis for the clinical events of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF (log-rank test, Conclusion: The Fib-4 index can be used to select appropriate candidates for a detailed examination of HFpEF in a subclinical population.

Indexed as

Heart-liver axisHFpEFLiver stiffnessMass screening

Identifiers

PMID39132617
PMCPMC11307393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.