ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2024
Racial/Ethnic, Sex, and Economic Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of Intracoronary Imaging.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sheltering From the Storm: Advancing Radiation Protection in Interventional Echocardiography.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Economic drivers and systemic disparities in invasive coronary angiography: Insights from a national claims database.PloS one · 2026Article
- Adjunctive Imaging and Physiology During PCI Among Black and White Medicare Beneficiaries: Disparities in Utilization Patterns and Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2025Article
- Fractional flow reserve versus intravascular ultrasound during percutaneous intervention.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Intracoronary Imaging: Blind to Color and Sex but Not Income or Insurance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. Data on racial/ethnic, sex, and economic disparities in the utilization and outcomes of intracoronary imaging in the United States are scarce. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020) to examine racial/ethnic, sex, and economic differences in the utilization of intracoronary imaging among patients who underwent PCI. Trends, in-hospital mortality, and safety of intracoronary imaging were also assessed. Results: Among 2,212,595 weighted hospitalizations for PCI, 204,735 (9.2%) included intracoronary imaging. The utilization rate of intracoronary imaging was similar in Black and Hispanic patients compared with White patients (9.8% vs 10.2% vs 10.0%; Conclusions: Low and medium income are independently associated with lower intracoronary imaging use in PCI compared with high income. Further studies are needed to identify effective strategies to mitigate economic disparities in intracoronary imaging use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.