Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132568›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes.

Yousif Ahmad, Mark C Petrie, E Marc Jolicoeur, Mahesh V Madhavan, Eric J Velazquez, Jeffrey W Moses, Alexandra J Lansky, Gregg W Stone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Heart Failure: Knowledge Gaps and Opportunities.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
  16. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yousif AhmadSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mark C PetrieUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
E Marc JolicoeurCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mahesh V MadhavanDivision of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Eric J VelazquezSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jeffrey W MosesDivision of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Alexandra J LanskySection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Gregg W StoneThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF). Revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone for these patients. Despite this, CABG is performed in a minority of patients with HF, partly due to patient unwillingness or inability to undergo major cardiac surgery and partly due to physician reluctance to refer for surgery due to high operative risk. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive method of revascularization that has the potential to reduce periprocedural complications compared with CABG in patients with HF. Recent advances in PCI technology and technique have made it realistic to achieve more complete revascularization with PCI in high-risk patients with HF, although no randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of PCI in HF compared with either medical therapy or CABG have been performed. In this review, we discuss the currently available evidence for PCI in HF and the association between the extent of revascularization and clinical outcomes in HF. We also review recent advances in PCI technology and techniques with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in HF. Finally, we discuss emerging clinical trial evidence of revascularization in HF and the large, persistent evidence gaps that should be addressed with future clinical trials of revascularization in HF.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass graftingHeart failurepercutaneous coronary interventionrevascularization

Identifiers

PMID39132568
PMCPMC11307477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.