ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2024
A Comprehensive Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biopsy Educational Program Utilizing Task Trainers.
Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advanced practice providers (APPs) who care for patients with hematologic malignancies perform bone marrow aspiration and biopsies (BMBXs). Invasive bedside procedures are often taught through the observational training method, which can lead to inconsistencies. Problem: The purpose of this project was to create and evaluate a standardized educational curriculum incorporating simulation with a task trainer for bone marrow transplant (BMT) APPs. The project aimed to reduce BMBX incident reporting events, improve BMBX knowledge, and increase APP self-reported confidence. Methods: Pre- and post-test surveys were utilized for knowledge assessment of BMBX procedures and specimen allocation. Program delivery occurred on five occasions to accommodate the needs of the team. Each program was delivered over 3 hours and included an educational Microsoft PowerPoint and three breakout sessions: BMBX kit review; simulation on task trainer; and review of BMBX specimen collection procedures. Knowledge assessment surveys were compared through descriptive and statistical analysis. Results: BMBX incident reporting events decreased from 1.92 events per month pre-implementation to 1.2 events per month post-implementation. Overall, BMBX knowledge increased from 41.02% on pre-test surveys to 65.72% on post-test surveys. Participant self-reported confidence improved by a mean difference of -1.85 based on a 5-point Likert scale, Implications: This project suggests that the use of simulation with task trainers is beneficial when paired with a standardized educational curriculum. Simulation training for APPs who perform BMBX improves procedural knowledge, increases self-reported confidence, and can reduce incident reporting events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.