Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132492›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Methods for joint modelling of longitudinal omics data and time-to-event outcomes: Applications to lysophosphatidylcholines in connection to aging and mortality in the Long Life Family Study.

Konstantin G Arbeev, Olivia Bagley, Svetlana V Ukraintseva, Alexander Kulminski, Eric Stallard, Michaela Schwaiger-Haber, Gary J Patti, Yian Gu, Anatoliy I Yashin, Michael A Province

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Konstantin G ArbeevBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4195-7832
Olivia BagleyBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Svetlana V UkraintsevaBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Alexander KulminskiBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Eric StallardBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Michaela Schwaiger-HaberDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Gary J PattiDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Yian GuTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Anatoliy I YashinBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Michael A ProvinceDivision of Statistical Genomics, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

Funding

The Long Life Family StudyU19AG063893 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PAOLA SEBASTIANI · 2019 to 2026
$125.4M
Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG063893NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying relationships between longitudinal changes in omics variables and risks of events requires specific methodologies for joint analyses of longitudinal and time-to-event outcomes. We applied two such approaches (joint models [JM], stochastic process models [SPM]) to longitudinal metabolomics data from the Long Life Family Study focusing on understudied associations of longitudinal changes in lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC) with mortality and aging-related outcomes (23 LPC species, 5,790 measurements of each in 4,011 participants, 1,431 of whom died during follow-up). JM analyses found that higher levels of the majority of LPC species were associated with lower mortality risks, with the largest effect size observed for LPC 15:0/0:0 (hazard ratio: 0.715, 95% CI (0.649, 0.788)). SPM applications to LPC 15:0/0:0 revealed how the association found in JM reflects underlying aging-related processes: decline in robustness to deviations from optimal LPC levels, better ability of males' organisms to return to equilibrium LPC levels (which are higher in females), and increasing gaps between the optimum and equilibrium levels leading to increased mortality risks with age. Our results support LPC as a biomarker of aging and related decline in robustness/resilience, and call for further exploration of factors underlying age-dynamics of LPC in relation to mortality and diseases.

Indexed as

aginglongitudinal omicslysophosphatidylcholinesmortalityrepeated measurements

Identifiers

PMID39132492
PMCPMC11312646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.