ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
The C-Brace® microprocessor controlled stance and swing orthosis improves safety, mobility, and quality of life at one year: Interim results from a prospective registry.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04640584 (A Prospective Registry of Patients Fitted With a Microprocessor-controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Registry of Patients Fitted With a Microprocessor-controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The C-Brace microprocessor-controlled stance and swing control orthosis has been shown to improve function, mobility, and quality of life. A systematic registry to gather long-term, real-world safety and effectiveness data in patients fit with a C-Brace has not been performed. Methods: International multicenter registry. Patients undergoing routine C-Brace fittings were assessed at baseline and 1 year after fitting. Primary outcomes were fast walking speed (FWS) measured by 25-foot or 10-meter walk test, Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included the Patient-specific Functional Scale (PSFS), falls, pain, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and quality of life. Results: 48 subjects with 1-year baseline and follow up data were analyzed. With the C-Brace, FWS improved by + 0.26 ± 0.33 m/s ( Conclusion: The C-Brace is an effective option to improve safety, mobility, and quality of life for patients needing a KAFO for ambulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.