ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection During Right Coronary Artery Procedures: A Systematic Review of the Published Literature.
Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel Surgical Repair of Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection: A Lifesaving Strategy.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Morphology Matters: Persistent Iatrogenic Aorto-Coronary Dissection Despite Initial Sealing Treated with a Stent-in-Stent Bailout Strategy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Progression of minor coronary dissection post-stenting to type A aortic dissection.AsiaIntervention · 2026Article
- Single Catheter Use as the Default Approach for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From bad to worse: a case report of bilateral iatrogenic coronary dissection complicated with cardiac arrest.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: detection, management, and prevention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- A practical approach to the management of percutaneous coronary intervention complications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Iatrogenic Coronary Dissection: From an Unexpected Diagnosis to a Lifesaving Intervention.Cureus · 2025Article
- Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection: Management and Outcomes.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Right Ventricular Failure Secondary to Right Coronary Artery Dissection Complicated by Impella Malfunction.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Management of Aortocoronary Dissection and Intramural Hematoma With Retrograde Approach and Cutting Balloon.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting for Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection: The Art of "Needlework".CJC open · 2025Article
- Successful bailout using perfusion balloon for iatrogenic catheter-induced coronary artery dissection.AsiaIntervention · 2025Article
- Invasive percutaneous management of iatrogenic aortic dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention of right coronary artery: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Management of Catheter-Induced Coronary Artery Dissection Leading to Extensive Bidirectional Intramural Hematoma.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Rescue of Iatrogenic Spiral Dissections Using an Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Parallel Wire Technique.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Hypoxemia Resulting From a Cascade of Postoperative Events Starting With Iatrogenic Right Ventricular Ischemia.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Dunning type III aortocoronary dissection after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. A case report.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iatrogenic aortocoronary dissection (IACD) occurs mainly during procedures involving the right coronary artery (RCA) and can result in disabilities, the need for urgent complex surgery, and even death. The risk factors for IACD are ill characterized, and the best management strategy is questionable; thus, there is a need to evaluate the characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of patients with IACD of the RCA. We searched medical databases for publications on IACD of the RCA to present the characteristics of the procedures, management, and outcomes. We report 142 cases of IACD of the RCA, reported between 1973 and 2021. The mean age of the patients was 63.0 years, 81 (57%) were men, 75 (52.8%) presented with stable angina, and 29 (20.4%) had chronic total occlusion of the RCA. The most used catheter shapes were Judkins right (42%) and Amplatz left (25%), and most (56%) catheters were used during percutaneous coronary interventions. Guiding catheters were used in 38% (19/50) of diagnostic procedures when IACD occurred. A catheter size of ≤5F was used in only 3 cases. The catheter size was 6F in 22% of the cases, >6F in 23%, and not reported in 52%. A high-grade dissection (Dunning class III) occurred in 54% (77/142) of the cases. Stenting of the RCA ostium was performed in 88 (62%) of the cases, conservative treatment in 25 (18%), and surgery in 40 (28%) (aortic root repair [5%], coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic root repair [11%], and coronary artery bypass grafting alone [10%]). The mortality rate was 6.5% (5/77) among patients with class III dissection. Each patient should be considered independently. The most frequent intervention was to seal the dissection with a stent in the ostial RCA. However, in select cases published in the literature, a conservative approach was a feasible and successful option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.