Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132321›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Innovative Hematology Analysis Using Menstrual Blood.

Endah Wulandari, Rr Ayu Fitri Hapsari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Endah WulandariDepartment of Biochemistry, Islamic State University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta of Medicine Faculty, South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-4466
Rr Ayu Fitri HapsariDepartment of Histology, Islamic State University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta of Medicine Faculty, South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-717X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The main aim of this study was to compare and analyze hematological profiles using menstrual blood, as an alternative to peripheral blood. Patients and Methods: This study used menstrual and peripheral blood samples from women who were menstruating. The design of this research is analytical observational. Results: Menstrual blood can show an overall hematological profile similar to peripheral blood. Data shows the detection of blood component parameters, white blood cells and reticulocytes in MB with a range within and outside normal blood. Data on MB that show higher values (WBC, MCH, MCHC, PLT, RDW-CV, PDW, MPV, P-LCR, PCT, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, reticulocytes, LFR, Ret-He) and lower values lower (RBC, HGB, HCT, MVC, RDW-SD, Eosinophils, IRF, MFR, HFR) when compared with peripheral blood controls. The hematological profiles of Menstrual and peripheral blood showed significant differences (p < 0.01) for several parameters, while several other parameters did not show significant differences (p > 0.05) according to the Wilcoxon test. Conclusion: All hematological profile parameters were detected in menstrual blood. The new concept that menstrual blood can be used as a supporting medium for hematological examinations opens up opportunities for developing independent hematological detection tools in productive women.

Indexed as

hematologicalmenstrual bloodperipheral bloodRBCreticulocyteWBC

Identifiers

PMID39132321
PMCPMC11313484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.