ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Gabapentinoids-Related Delirium Adverse Events: A Real-World Study from 2004 to 2022 Based on FAERS.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study comprehensively describes and evaluates the correlation between gabapentinoids and all types of delirium. Methods: We used AERSMine to select all adverse reaction data from 2004 Q1 to the 2022 Q4 in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and delirium events reported by gabapentinoids drugs were included in this study. Collected and analyzed the clinical details of these reports. We have developed four models. Among the four models, reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were used to evaluate the potential association between and delirium. We undertook a subgroup analysis for the age and sex cohorts. Results: A total of 2950 reports of gabapentinoids-related delirium was collected. Excluding cases with a history of delirium (Model 2), opioid drugs (Model 3), and other adverse events related to gabapentinoids drugs (Model 4), pain cases with gabapentin drugs as the main suspected drug were selected. In model 1, the reporting rates of delirium at the delirium and delirium tremens levels were higher in the gabapentinoids group than in the non-gabapentinoids group (ROR 1.09(1.05,1.13); ROR 1.54(1.16,2.04)). In model 2.3 the delira and the delirium level were higher in the gabapentinoids group (ROR 1.42(1.29,1.56), ROR 1.44(1.31,1.59); ROR 1.43(1.30,1.58), ROR 1.46(1.33,1.61)). There is no difference in delirium levels in Model 4. Delirium levels were higher in the gabapentinoids group than in the non-gabapentinoids group in ≥65 years old. The delirium and deliria levels were higher in the male group than in the female group. Conclusion: The delirium adverse reactions of the gabapentinoids group were significantly higher than those of non-gabapentinoids group in the first three models. However, with the removal of confounding factors, there was no significant difference in this type of adverse reaction in Model 4. In elderly and male patients, the incidence of delirium with gabapentinoids was significantly increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.