ArticleBioinformation2024
Evaluation of alveolar bone width alterations around dental implants.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With and Without Bone Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Pooled it
- Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Levels Around Dental Implants and Natural Teeth: A Prospective Study.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teeth that are lost can be replaced with dental implants. A sufficient width of bone surrounding the implant is beneficial to its success. Therefore, it is of interest to examine alterations in width of alveolar bone surrounding dental implants at natural and rebuilt bone locations [alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) /Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)] using CTBT. A CBCT examination of the implant recipient site was performed on sixty patients (both male and female), who had undergone dental implants. All conventional surgical procedures were followed for inserting dental implants. All participants had their horizontal alveolar bone widths around implants assessed at 3 positions: subcrestal width 1 mm (CW1 (crestal level-CW1), subcrestal width 4 mm (CW4), and subcrestal width 7 mm (CW7). There were 32 male patients and 28 female patients out of 60 totals. The mean bone width was 7.02 mm at CW1 prior to surgery and 6.91 mm afterward; it was 8.52 mm at CW4 and 8.13 mm afterward; and it was 10.21 mm at CW7 prior to surgery and 10.08 mm afterward. There was a substantial difference (P<0.05). At CW1, the bone width was 0.38 mm at local bone and -0.02 mm at ARP/GBR; at CW4, the bone width was 0.46 mm at local bone and 0.23 mm at ARP/GBR; and at CW7, the bone width was 0.22 mm at local bone and 0.02 mm at ARP/GBR. There was no discernible difference (P>0.05). Resorption of the alveolar bone width was only noticeable at the middle third of the sites. Long-term alterations in the alveolar bone width surrounding dental implants at local and rebuilt bone sites can be observed using CBCT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.