Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132240›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Evaluation of alveolar bone width alterations around dental implants.

K Sai Priyanka, Pushkar Gupta, Lipika Gopal, A Karan Kumar, Anas Abdul A Karan, Banashree Baishya, Nazargi Mohabob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K Sai PriyankaPeriodontist, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pushkar GuptaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge , Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, MP, India.
Lipika GopalDepartment of Periodontolgy, Manav Rachana Dental College, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
A Karan KumarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anas Abdul A KaranDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Banashree BaishyaDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Hi Tech Dental College & Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Nazargi MohabobDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teeth that are lost can be replaced with dental implants. A sufficient width of bone surrounding the implant is beneficial to its success. Therefore, it is of interest to examine alterations in width of alveolar bone surrounding dental implants at natural and rebuilt bone locations [alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) /Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)] using CTBT. A CBCT examination of the implant recipient site was performed on sixty patients (both male and female), who had undergone dental implants. All conventional surgical procedures were followed for inserting dental implants. All participants had their horizontal alveolar bone widths around implants assessed at 3 positions: subcrestal width 1 mm (CW1 (crestal level-CW1), subcrestal width 4 mm (CW4), and subcrestal width 7 mm (CW7). There were 32 male patients and 28 female patients out of 60 totals. The mean bone width was 7.02 mm at CW1 prior to surgery and 6.91 mm afterward; it was 8.52 mm at CW4 and 8.13 mm afterward; and it was 10.21 mm at CW7 prior to surgery and 10.08 mm afterward. There was a substantial difference (P<0.05). At CW1, the bone width was 0.38 mm at local bone and -0.02 mm at ARP/GBR; at CW4, the bone width was 0.46 mm at local bone and 0.23 mm at ARP/GBR; and at CW7, the bone width was 0.22 mm at local bone and 0.02 mm at ARP/GBR. There was no discernible difference (P>0.05). Resorption of the alveolar bone width was only noticeable at the middle third of the sites. Long-term alterations in the alveolar bone width surrounding dental implants at local and rebuilt bone sites can be observed using CBCT images.

Indexed as

Bone widthCBCTDental implantevaluation

Identifiers

PMID39132240
PMCPMC11309100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.