ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2024
Use of Calcium Modification During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Introduction of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and feasibility of rotational atherectomy in chronic total occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Dual-Prep registry: Atherectomy devices and intravascUlAr lithotripsy for the PREParation of heavily calcified coronary lesions registry, 1-year results.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with intravascular lithotripsy for severe calcified lesions.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Ultimaster TANSEI Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions: The EPIC08 TANSEI COMPLEX Study.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Article
- The Role of Orbital Atherectomy for Complex Coronary Calcium Modification: Has It Been Eclipsed?Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Breaking Down the Risk During Intravascular Lithotripsy: Is It the Lesion, the Lithotripsy, or the Lack of Intravascular Imaging?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Disparities in the Use of Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Between a Rock and a Hard Place: A Consensus Statement on the Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Coronary intravascular lithotripsy: the tombstone of coronary calcium.Future cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calcified coronary lesions are a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification technology approved for commercial use in February 2021, but little is known about its uptake in US clinical practice. Methods: We described trends in use of calcium modification strategies, variation in use across hospitals, and predictors of calcium modification and IVL use in PCI. We included National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry patients who underwent PCI between April 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. We examined trends and hospital variation in calcium modification and IVL use. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to identify predictors of calcium modification and IVL use at hospitals in 2022. Results: Of 2,733,494 PCIs across 1676 hospitals over 4.75 years, 11.4% were performed with calcium modification. Coronary IVL use increased rapidly from 0% of PCIs in Q4 2020 to 7.8% of PCIs in Q4 2022, which was accompanied by an overall increase in use of all calcium modification strategies (11.1%-16.0%) during this period with a slight corresponding decrease in coronary atherectomy use (5.4%-4.4%). In 2022, there was wide variation in IVL use across hospitals (median, 3.86%; IQR, 0%-8.19%), with IVL being the most common calcium modification strategy in 48% of hospitals. The treating hospital was the strongest predictor of calcium modification (median odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% CI, 2.40-2.57) and IVL use (median OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.74-3.04). Conclusions: IVL has rapidly changed the landscape of calcium modification use for PCI, although there remains wide variation across hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.