ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2024
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Role of topical self-assembling peptide in preventing delayed bleeding following advanced endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging the gap: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the management of rectal wall defect after transanal excision.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of a snare-based hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection technique in the management of esophageal submucosal tumors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic virtual ruler (EVR) based on image recognition technology: a novel tool for decision support in endoscopic treatment.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Effects of endoscopic mucosal resection and argon plasma coagulation on postoperative recovery and complications in elderly colon polyp patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Disease-specific alterations of the enteric nervous system in precancerous colonic mucosa and their implications for mucin regulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: How Precision Medicine Is Changing the Game.Cancers · 2025Review
- The effects of different traction devices on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to 15% of colorectal polyps are amenable for conventional polypectomy. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are introduced for the treatment of those polyps. They provide higher en bloc resection rates compared with conventional techniques, while helping patients to avoid the complications of surgery. Note that 20 mm is considered as the largest size of a polyp that can be resected by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in an en bloc fashion. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for polyps larger than 20 mm. Intramucosal carcinomas and carcinomas with limited submucosal invasion can also be resected with ESD. EMR is snare resection of a polyp following submucosal injection and elevation. ESD involves several steps such as marking, submucosal injection, incision, and dissection. Bleeding and perforation are the most common complications following advanced endoscopic procedures, which can be treated with coagulation and endoscopic clipping. En bloc resection rates range from 44.5 to 63% for EMR and from 87.9 to 96% for ESD. Recurrence rates following EMR and ESD are 7.4 to 17% and 0.9 to 2%, respectively. ESD is considered enough for the treatment of invasive carcinomas in the presence of submucosal invasion less than 1000 μm, absence of lymphovascular invasion, well-moderate histological differentiation, low-grade tumor budding, and negative resection margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.