ArticleGastro hep advances2024
Identification of Fast Progressors Among Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Using Machine Learning.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: There is a high unmet need to develop noninvasive tools to identify nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) patients at risk of fast progression to end-stage liver disease (ESLD). This study describes the development of a machine learning (ML) model using data around the first clinical evidence of NAFLD/NASH to identify patients at risk of future fast progression. Methods: Adult patients with ESLD (cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma) due to NAFLD/NASH were identified in Optum electronic health records (2007-2018 period). Patients were stratified into fast (0.5 and 3 years) and standard progressor (6-10 years) cohorts based on retrospectively established progression time between ESLD and the earliest observable disease, and characteristics were reported using descriptive statistics. Two ML models predicting fast progression were created, performance was compared, and top predictive features from the final model were compared between cohorts. Results: Among a total of 4013 NAFLD patients with cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (mean age 58.6 ± 12.5; 65% female), 24% were fast (n = 951) and 25% standard (n = 992) progressors that were used for modeling. The cohorts were comparable for gender, body mass index, type 2 diabetes, and arterial hypertension, but differed significantly for obesity, hyperlipidemia, and age at index. The final model (NASH FASTmap) is a 44 feature light gradient boosting model which performed better (area under the curve [0.77], F1-score [0.74], accuracy [0.71], and precision [0.71]) than eXtreme gradient boosting model to predict fast progression. Conclusion: Future fast progression to ESLD in NAFLD/NASH patients can be predicted from clinical data using ML. Electronic health record implementation of NASH FASTmap could support clinical assessment for risk stratification and potentially improve disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.