ArticleGastro hep advances2022
Evaluation of Heterologous Effects of Travel Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer: A Database Study and a Cautionary Tale.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Recently, cholera vaccine use was shown to be associated with a reduced risk of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, evidence on heterologous effects of travel vaccines is limited. The aim of this study was to study heterologous effects of travel vaccines in patients with CRC. Methods: We performed a retrospective database study on a cohort of CRC patients in Sweden and their postdiagnostic use of travel medications between July 2005 and December 2017. We obtained data from national registries on number of CRC diagnosis, death from CRC or other causes, age at diagnosis, and postdiagnostic use of travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis. The Cox regression model was used to calculate incidence rate and incidence rate ratios of CRC-related and all-cause mortality by postdiagnostic travel medication status. Results: Two hundred ninety-five patients exposed to travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis and 73,466 patients not exposed to travel medications were identified. CRC-related mortality was lowered in the exposed patients compared to the unexposed patients, irrespective of the travel medications used. The incidence rate ratios for CRC-related mortality and overall mortality were comparable. Conclusion: We postulated that patients in better health were likely to travel more frequently than patients with poor health, leading to a healthy user bias. The results suggested the same, as similar reduced mortality risks were found for all the investigated travel medications, lowering the biological plausibility of truly protective effect from post-therapeutic use of any of the travel medication studied. We advocate the use of multiple negative exposure controls and to exercise caution while drawing conclusions from travel vaccine research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.