ArticleGastro hep advances2023
Distinction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury From Autoimmune Hepatitis in Patients With Acute Liver Injury: Proposal of a Combination of Diagnostic Scores.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis by Varenicline and Infliximab as a Continuous Disease Spectrum with Two Different Flares: Acute Liver Injury Followed by Hepatic Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis: Robust Causality Assessment Using Two Different Validated and Scoring Diagnostic Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Acute liver injury (ALI) due to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can be treated by immunosuppression. In contrast, idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) had a poor prognosis. DILI thus needs to be distinguished from non-DILI. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with DILI and 77 with non-DILI (42 of AIH and 35 with undetermined cause) diagnosed during 2005-2017 comprised the derivation cohort. 110 patients with ALI due to either AIH, DILI, or obscure causes at 6 liver centers during 2010-2015 were the validation cohort. Revised international AIH group scores (IAIHGs) and the Roussel-Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) were modified to calculate results using medical interviews and laboratory data without chronological changes. Diagnostic accuracy for the distinction of DILI and non-DILI was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis and results were expressed as the area under the curve (AUC). This study received institutional institutional review board approval (MH2020-205). Results: The AUCs of modified IAIHGs and RUCAM scores for the diagnosis of DILI were 0.96 and 1.00 when cut-off values were set at 3 for the modified RUCAM and 5 for the modified IAIHGs in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, the AUCs of modified IAIHGs and RUCAM scores for the diagnosis of DILI were 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. The accuracy of the combination of the modified scores was 81% (89/110). Conclusion: Modified diagnostic scores based on detailed medical interviews and routine laboratory data can distinguish DILI from non-DILI in patients with ALI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.