ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-World Study on Effectiveness, Safety and Predictors of Treatment Outcome.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Era of Targeted Therapy: From Pathogenic Mechanisms to Precision Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Omalizumab-Associated Post-Injection Urticaria Exacerbation and Urticaria-Related Adverse Reactions During Treatment for Chronic Urticaria: A Scoping Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Real-world efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Insights from the Middle East.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Vitamin B12 Levels in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Patients and Correlation with Severity of Disease.Maedica · 2026Article
- Chronic spontaneous urticaria treatments and purinergic signaling: a therapeutic possibility.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Analysis of Predictors of Response Degree to Omalizumab in 124 Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Omalizumab demonstrates efficacy and safety in Chinese children under 12 with chronic urticaria: a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Predictors of Early Response and Relapse in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Treated with Omalizumab: The Role of Age, Sex, Disease Duration, and UAS7.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- Biological and target synthetic treatments for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- The prevalence of patients suffering from chronic spontaneous urticaria, in whom omalizumab cannot be stopped even after six years.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although omalizumab has shown success in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients unresponsive to antihistamines, the exact mechanism of action and predictive markers of response remain unclear. Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers and clinical parameters with omalizumab response and response rate in patients with CSU. Methods: This retrospective study included 82 adult CSU patients who received omalizumab 300mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks between January 2022 and December 2023. Treatment response was assessed using UAS7 and DLQI scores at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Responders were defined as patients achieving UAS7 < 7, with early and late responders categorized based on response within or after 4 weeks, respectively. Baseline clinical features and laboratory biomarkers were compared between responders and non-responders. Results: The overall response rate was 71.95% (59/82), with 23 early responders and 36 late responders. Responders had significantly lower baseline UAS7 (median: 28 vs 35, P < 0.01), DLQI (median: 8 vs 15, P < 0.001), and IL-17 levels (median: 0.53 vs 1.26 pg/mL, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Baseline UAS7 > 31, DLQI > 9.5, and IL-17 > 0.775 pg/mL predicted non-response with sensitivities of 78.26%, 100%, and 78.26%, and specificities of 67.8%, 59.32%, and 72.88%, respectively. ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with early response (P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 6.09% of patients, including mild injection site reactions and transient urticaria exacerbation, not requiring treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: This study suggests that omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment option for antihistamine-refractory CSU. Baseline UAS7, DLQI, ASST status, serum total IgE levels, and IL-17 may serve as potential predictors of omalizumab response. Notably, ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with an early response to treatment. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual patient characteristics when predicting the likelihood and timing of response to omalizumab in CSU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.