ArticleKidney medicine2024
Glucocorticoid Minimization in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: An International Survey of Clinicians.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis: Current, Future Therapies, Unmet Need and Patient Management.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Addressing clinical challenges in ANCA-associated vasculitis with real-world evidence.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Making use of avacopan in clinical practice.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Research in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) has focused on reducing treatment toxicities, notably through reduction of exposure to glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as avacopan are not widely available in many countries, and patients are exposed to high glucocorticoid doses. There is little data concerning what clinicians should accept as the lowest glucocorticoid dosing that can be used in induction therapy for AAV. Study Design: International, online survey. Setting & Participants: Clinicians in various countries with experience in managing vasculitis. Exposure and Outcomes: Survey questions to gauge interest and preferences in studying an induction of remission regimen for severe AAV using only 2 or 4 weeks of glucocorticoids without avacopan. Data collected included general opinions about standard of care for induction agents, glucocorticoids, and avacopan. Respondents were presented with 3 candidate trial designs, 2 of which proposed a combination of cyclophosphamide and rituximab induction. Analytical Approach: Using a 10-point Likert scale, respondents ranked each candidate trial on its usefulness in demonstrating whether a minimal glucocorticoid regimen would be safe and effective and their willingness to randomize into the trial. Results: There were 210 respondents to the survey. The candidate trials were rated moderate-to-high for usefulness to demonstrate safety and efficacy (scores 6-7/10), and moderate (scores 5-6/10) for willingness to randomize. Four-week glucocorticoid duration was preferred to 2 weeks, and combination cyclophosphamide-rituximab with 4-week glucocorticoids was the most preferred design. Forty-two percent of respondents felt avacopan had to be incorporated into a minimal GC trial design to want to recruit patients. Limitations: Representativeness of survey sample and generalizability of findings. Conclusions: Combination cyclophosphamide-rituximab may be the ideal way of studying minimal glucocorticoid use in severe AAV. Given its increasing uptake, incorporating avacopan into a potential trial design is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.