Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131912›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Discordance between taxonomy and population genomic data: An avian example relevant to the United States Endangered Species Act.

Andrew N Black, Andrew J Mularo, Jong Yoon Jeon, David Haukos, Kristin J Bondo, Kent A Fricke, Andy Gregory, Blake Grisham, Zachary E Lowe, J Andrew DeWoody

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew N BlackDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-9460
Andrew J MularoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 66506, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-3533
Jong Yoon JeonDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-8425
David HaukosU.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5372-9960
Kristin J BondoDepartment of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79410, USA.
Kent A FrickeKansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia, KS 66801, USA.
Andy GregoryDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76201, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236
Blake GrishamDepartment of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79410, USA.
Zachary E LoweWestern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Boise, ID 83719, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6139-5349
J Andrew DeWoodyDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7315-5631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population genomics can reveal cryptic biological diversity that may impact fitness while simultaneously serving to delineate relevant conservation units. Here, we leverage the power of whole-genome resequencing for conservation by studying 433 individual lesser prairie-chicken (

Indexed as

Endangered Species Actgenetic diversityintrogressionprairie-chickenwhole-genome resequencing

Identifiers

PMID39131912
PMCPMC11313583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.