Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131896›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2024

Communication skills of medical students: Evaluation of a new communication curriculum at the University of Augsburg.

Giulia Zerbini, Philipp Reicherts, Miriam Reicherts, Nina Roob, Pia Schneider, Andrea Dankert, Sophie-Kathrin Greiner, Martina Kadmon, Veronika Lechner, Marco Roos and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Beliefs for successful feedback communication.GMS journal for medical education · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giulia ZerbiniUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology and Sociology, Institute of Theoretical Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.
Philipp ReichertsUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology and Sociology, Institute of Theoretical Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.
Miriam ReichertsUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology and Sociology, Institute of Theoretical Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.
Nina RoobUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education Sciences (DEMEDA), Augsburg, Germany.
Pia SchneiderUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology and Sociology, Institute of Theoretical Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.
Andrea DankertUniversity Hospital Augsburg, Psychooncology Service, CCCA, Augsburg, Germany.
Sophie-Kathrin GreinerUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Augsburg, Germany.
Martina KadmonUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany.
Veronika LechnerUniversity Hospital Augsburg, Psychooncology Service, CCCA, Augsburg, Germany.
Marco RoosUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Practice, Augsburg, Germany.
Mareike SchimmelUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.
Wolfgang StrubeUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Augsburg, Germany.
Selin TemizelUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.
Luise UhrmacherUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Augsburg, Germany.
Miriam KunzUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology and Sociology, Institute of Theoretical Medicine, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Teaching communication skills plays a pivotal role in medical curricula. The aim of this article is to describe and evaluate a new communication curriculum developed at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg (KomCuA), which was conceptualized by an interdisciplinary team based on recommended quality standards (i.e., helical, integrated, longitudinal). Methods: A total of 150 medical students enrolled in the 1 Results: Overall, students reported improved communications skills due to attending the KomCuA and further considered practicing with simulated patients as being very helpful (large effect sizes). Compared to 1 Conclusion: The KomCuA has shown to be an effective communication curriculum to support medical students in the development of their communication skills and positive attitudes towards empathy. Additional studies assessing students' communication skills and empathic attitudes longitudinally are warranted to confirm the present results and to gain further knowledge on how these essential skills and attitudes develop across medical curricula.

Indexed as

CommunicationCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceEmpathyFemaleGermanyHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and Questionnairescommunicationcommunication skillseducationempathymedical curriculumsimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID39131896
PMCPMC11310792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.