ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Characterizing behavioural differentiation in gene regulatory networks with representation graphs.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce the formal notion of representation graphs, encapsulating the state space structure of gene regulatory network models in a compact and concise form that highlights the most significant features of stable states and differentiation processes leading to distinct stability regions. The concept has been developed in the context of a hybrid system-based gene network modelling framework; however, we anticipate that it can also be adapted to other approaches of modelling gene networks in discrete terms. We describe a practical algorithm for representation graph computation as well as two case studies demonstrating their real-world application and utility. The first case study presents models for three phage viruses. It shows that the process of differentiation into lytic and lysogenic behavioural states for all these models is described by the same representation graph despite the distinctive underlying mechanisms for differentiation. The second case study shows the advantages of our approach for modelling the process of myeloid cell differentiation from a common progenitor into different cell types. Both case studies also demonstrate the potential of the representation graph approach for deriving and validating hypotheses about regulatory interactions that must be satisfied for biologically viable behaviours.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.