Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131817›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

Methods for evaluating unsupervised vector representations of genomic regions.

Guangtao Zheng, Julia Rymuza, Erfaneh Gharavi, Nathan J LeRoy, Aidong Zhang, Nathan C Sheffield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling TCR-pMHC Binding with Dual Encoders and Cross-Attention Fusion.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guangtao ZhengDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-4931
Julia RymuzaDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2762-9048
Erfaneh GharaviDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4444-2751
Nathan J LeRoyDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7354-7213
Aidong ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-3246
Nathan C SheffieldDepartment of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5643-4068

Funding

A modular data analysis ecosystem using portable encapsulated projectsR35GM128636 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SHEFFIELD, NATHAN · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Novel methods for large-scale genomic interval comparisonR01HG012558 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SHEFFIELD, NATHAN · 2022 to 2025
$1.8M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012558NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128636NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representation learning models have become a mainstay of modern genomics. These models are trained to yield vector representations, or embeddings, of various biological entities, such as cells, genes, individuals, or genomic regions. Recent applications of unsupervised embedding approaches have been shown to learn relationships among genomic regions that define functional elements in a genome. Unsupervised representation learning of genomic regions is free of the supervision from curated metadata and can condense rich biological knowledge from publicly available data to region embeddings. However, there exists no method for evaluating the quality of these embeddings in the absence of metadata, making it difficult to assess the reliability of analyses based on the embeddings, and to tune model training to yield optimal results. To bridge this gap, we propose four evaluation metrics: the cluster tendency score (CTS), the reconstruction score (RCS), the genome distance scaling score (GDSS), and the neighborhood preserving score (NPS). The CTS and RCS statistically quantify how well region embeddings can be clustered and how well the embeddings preserve information in training data. The GDSS and NPS exploit the biological tendency of regions close in genomic space to have similar biological functions; they measure how much such information is captured by individual region embeddings in a set. We demonstrate the utility of these statistical and biological scores for evaluating unsupervised genomic region embeddings and provide guidelines for learning reliable embeddings.

Identifiers

PMID39131817
PMCPMC11316252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.