ReviewThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2024
Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity.
Review in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pericardial Decompression Syndrome Complicated by Left Ventricular Thrombus and Systemic Embolization.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Paradoxical Hemodynamics in Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: Cardiogenic Shock and Recovery With Mechanical Circulatory Support.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- The Jack-in-the-Box: Pericardial Decompression Syndrome Managed by a Multidisciplinary Approach with Early Initiation of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pericardial decompression syndrome is an ambiguous clinical entity which has generated controversy regarding its existence. Following pericardial decompression, patients experienced clinical deterioration ranging in complications from pulmonary edema to death that could not be attributed to any other distinct clinical pathology. Multiple theories have suggested the pathophysiology behind pericardial decompression syndrome is related to preload-afterload mismatch following pericardial decompression, coronary microvascular ischemia, and stress from high adrenergic state. Our review aims to describe this syndrome by analyzing demographics, etiology of pericardial effusion, method of drainage, volume of pericardial fluid removed, time to decompensation, and clinical outcomes. A systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for case reports, case series, review articles, and abstracts published in English journals between 1983 and December 2022. Each author's interpretation of echocardiographic and/or pulmonary arterial catheterization data provided in the case reports was used to characterize ventricular dysfunction. Based on our inclusion criteria, 72 cases of pericardial decompression syndrome were included in our review. Our results showed that phenotypic heterogeneity was present based on echocardiographic findings of right/left or biventricular failure with similar proportions in each type of ventricular dysfunction. Time to decompensation was similar between immediate, subacute, and acute cases with presentation varying between hypoxic respiratory failure and shock. This review article highlights theories behind the pathophysiology, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic options in this high mortality condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.