ArticleGastro hep advances2024
A Real-World Experience Utilizing the FAST Score to Identify Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Fibrosis.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transient Elastography and Fibroscan: Stethoscope of a Hepatologist in Today's World.Current hepatology reports · 2025Article
- Multiparametric Quantitative Ultrasound as a Potential Imaging Biomarker for Noninvasive Detection of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Clinical Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: We aimed to test the performance of the Fibroscan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score, a noninvasive test, to identify nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and significant fibrosis (NASH + ≥F2) in a cohort of patients with a histological diagnosis of NASH, using a cutoff of ≥0.35 as a rule in factor. We also compared performance to liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥8 kPa and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) ≥1.3 and attempted to identify risk factors to develop a model for improving diagnostic accuracy. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed NASH were identified from 2020-2021. Demographic information, laboratory data, and LSM were collected. The FAST score and FIB-4 were calculated. Univariate and backward entry multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors in addition to the FAST score ≥0.35 that are associated with an accurate histological diagnosis of NASH + ≥F2. Discrimination and overall accuracy were assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Using a rule in cutoff of ≥0.35, the FAST score performed with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 96.4%, 36.8%, 77.7%, and 81.8%, respectively. Age ( Conclusion: A FAST score with a rule cutoff of ≥0.35 performed well (c-statistic: 0.70) and was superior to LSM and FIB-4 when age was incorporated into the model (0.78) in detecting NASH + ≥F2 fibrosis in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.