Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131660›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Five-Year Independent Patient-Level Mortality Analysis of the Pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sean P Lyden, Marianne Brodmann, Henrik Schroeder, Andrew Holden, Kenneth Ouriel, Trisha R Tarra, William A Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment in French Patients: A Longitudinal Observational Study.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
  2. Late Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: Has the Controversy Finally Come to an End?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean P LydenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Marianne BrodmannDivision of Angiology, Medical University Graz, Austria.
Henrik SchroederCenter for Diagnostic Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, The Jewish Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Andrew HoldenAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kenneth OurielNAMSA, New York, New York.
Trisha R TarraPhilips North America LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
William A GrayLankenau Heart Institute/Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a need to evaluate the latest information regarding a potential late safety signal in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices for peripheral artery disease. We evaluated the 5-year all-cause mortality rate of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Methods: An independent third-party performed a patient-level meta-analysis of the pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was time to death. Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause mortality were compared with the log-rank test. Predictors of mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazard modeling. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicated all serious adverse events (including death). The follow-up was 60 months. Results: A total of 589 patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years (IQR, 4.8, 5.1 years); 419 were randomized to Stellarex DCB and 170 to PTA. Vital status was obtained for 93.8%. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from all-cause death were 80.4% (95% CI, 76.7%-84.3%) in the Stellarex DCB arm versus 80.4% (95% CI, 74.3%-86.5%) in the PTA arm (log-rank, Conclusions: There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the Stellarex DCB and PTA through the final 5-year follow-up window of 2 ILLUMENATE randomized controlled trials. These long-term data build on the previously reported safety of the Stellarex DCB for treating symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease.

Indexed as

drug-coated balloonmeta-analysismortalitypaclitaxelperipheral artery disease

Identifiers

PMID39131660
PMCPMC11308630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.