ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
One-year Outcomes of XIENCE Skypoint 48-mm Drug-Eluting Stents in Long Coronary Lesions: The SPIRIT 48 Trial.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07399002 (Long Coronary Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Long Coronary Lesions: Safety and Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ Stent in This Setting With a One-to-one Approach -One Lesion, One Stent- LONG NAGOMI™ PMCF STUDY
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Lesion-specific Stenting Strategies: A Computational Framework to Validate the Deployment of Balloon-expandable Stents.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of BioMime Sirolimus-Eluting Stent System in All-Comers Real-World Population With Coronary Artery Stenosis: MILES Global Registry.Cardiology research · 2024Article
- Long-Term Safety and Performance of BioMime™ Morph Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System for Very Long Coronary Lesions.Cardiology research · 2024Article
- Highlights From the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) Scientific Sessions 2023.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diffuse coronary artery disease may need multiple overlapping stents, associated with less favorable outcomes than those of a single stent. The availability of longer stents can circumvent the need for overlapping stents in long lesions. This prospective, single-arm, SPIRIT 48 trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of Abbott's next-generation drug-eluting stent, XIENCE Skypoint 48, in patients with coronary artery disease with long de novo native coronary lesions. Methods: SPIRIT 48 enrolled 107 patients at 25 sites in 3 countries. Patients were required to have 1 target lesion treated with XIENCE Skypoint 48 (lesion length of >32.0 mm and ≤44.0 mm). The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) at the 1-year compared with a prespecified performance goal of 20%, established through historical control data. This study recently completed its 1-year follow-up. Results: XIENCE Skypoint 48 was implanted in 105 patients with a device success rate of 97.2%. SPIRIT 48 met its primary end point, with a TLF rate of 5.7%, and the upper bound of 95% CI at 9.5% (<performance goal of 20%). This was associated with a low rate of 5.8% (6/104 patients) for cardiac death/all myocardial infarction at 1 year. Definite or probable device thrombosis at 1 year occurred in only 1 subject (1.0%). Conclusions: Primary end point data obtained at the 1-year follow-up from the SPIRIT 48 trial present strong evidence supporting the deliverability, safety, and effectiveness of XIENCE Skypoint 48 mm drug-eluting stent in treating long de novo coronary lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.