Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131633›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Update on Radiation Safety in the Cath Lab - Moving Toward a "Lead-Free" Environment.

Ariel Roguin, Perry Wu, Travis Cohoon, Fahad Gul, George Nasr, Ned Premyodhin, Morton J Kern

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ALARA+: Summit on Radiation and Orthopedic Risks in Fluoroscopic Laboratories.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  10. Radiation-Free Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Myth or Reality?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Variability in State-Level Regulations Regarding Occupational Radiation Exposure.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  13. Occupational Health Hazards in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Results of the 2023 SCAI Survey.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  14. An intuitive guidewire control mechanism for robotic intervention.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  18. What Is Needed to Encourage Women to Choose Careers in Interventional Cardiology.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Differing radiation exposure in scrub technicians and rotating staff in Cardiac catheterization laboratory: occupation matters.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ariel RoguinDepartment of Cardiology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.
Perry WuDivision of Cardiology, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.
Travis CohoonDivision of Cardiology, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.
Fahad GulDivision of Cardiology, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.
George NasrDivision of Cardiology, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.
Ned PremyodhinDivision of Cardiology, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.
Morton J KernDivision of Cardiology, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) is an occupational hazard that predisposes health care workers to the development of adverse health effects such as cataracts, cancer, and orthopedic injury. To mitigate radiation exposure, personal protective shielding as well as permanently installed shields reduces these adverse effects. Yet, heavy protective lead aprons and poor ergonomics required for positioning movable shields remain barriers to a safer environment. Recent innovations to enhance personal protective equipment and revolutionize fixed shielding systems will permit the CCL team to work in a personal "lead-free" environment, markedly reducing occupational hazards. The purpose of this review is to update the status and future of radiation protection in the CCL.

Indexed as

coronary angiographycoronary interventionradiation

Identifiers

PMID39131633
PMCPMC11307637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.