Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2024

Voluntary wheel running access produces opposite effects in male and female rats on both palatable diet consumption and associated ventral striatal opioid- and dopamine-related gene expression.

Courtney G Kocum, Yonca Cam, Dusti A Shay, Tim A Schweizer, Ella R Konrad, Tabitha K Houska, Carlos A Sardina, Todd R Schachtman, Victoria J Vieira-Potter, Matthew J Will

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Courtney G KocumDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Yonca CamDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Dusti A ShayDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Tim A SchweizerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Ella R KonradDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Tabitha K HouskaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Carlos A SardinaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Todd R SchachtmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Victoria J Vieira-PotterDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Matthew J WillDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between physical activity levels and feeding behaviors has been a focus of preclinical research for decades, yet this interaction has only recently been explored for potential sex differences. The aim of the present study was to isolate sex-dependent effects of voluntary wheel running (RUN) vs. sedentary locked wheel (SED) home cage conditions on palatability-driven feeding behavior using a 2-diet choice task between standard chow and a high-fat diet. The sex-dependent effects of physical activity on feeding behavior were examined following a within-subject novel reversal design of physical activity conditions (i.e., RUN > SED > RUN), to assess temporal sensitivity of the interaction. Following the final 2 weeks of reestablished and sustained RUN vs. SED conditions in separate groups of both males and females, reward-related opioid and dopamine gene expression within the nucleus accumbens (Acb) brain region were analyzed. Results demonstrated that the initial RUN > SED transition led to sex-dependent effects of SED condition, as males increased, and females decreased their high fat consumption, compared to their respective high fat consumption during previous RUN condition phase. Following reintroduction to the RUN condition, males decreased, and females increased their high fat consumption, compared to their separate SED control group. Last, sex-dependent shifts in ventral striatal opioid- and dopamine-related gene expression were observed to parallel the behavioral effects. The major findings of the study reveal that SED and RUN home cage conditions shift palatability-driven feeding in the opposite direction for males and females, these effects are sensitive to reversal, and these sex-dependent feeding behaviors track sex-dependent changes to critical reward-related gene expression patterns in the Acb. Considering the present high rates of sedentary behavior and obesity, furthering our understanding of the interaction between physical activity (or lack thereof) and feeding behavior should be a priority, especially in the context of these divergent sex-dependent outcomes.

Indexed as

diet preferencesdopaminehigh fat dietnucleus accumbensopioidsphysical activitysex differencesvoluntary wheel running

Identifiers

PMID39131599
PMCPMC11310025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.