ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Improving radiological quantification of levator hiatus features with measures informed by statistical shape modeling.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Racial differences in the levator ani muscle and levator hiatus in individuals of reproductive age.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The measures that traditionally describe the levator hiatus (LH) are straightforward and reliable; however, they were not specifically designed to capture significant differences. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) was used to quantify LH shape variation across reproductive-age women and identify novel variables associated with LH size and shape. Approach: A retrospective study of pelvic MRIs from 19 nulliparous, 32 parous, and 12 pregnant women was performed. The LH was segmented in the plane of minimal LH dimensions. SSM was implemented. LH size was defined by the cross-sectional area, maximal transverse diameter, and anterior-posterior (A-P) diameter. Novel SSM-guided variables were defined by regions of greatest variation. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) evaluated group differences, and correlations determined relationships between size and shape variables. Results: Overall shape ( Conclusions: The traditional maximal transverse diameter generally corresponded with SSM findings but cannot describe anterior and posterior variation independently. The novel anterior and posterior transverse diameters represent both size and shape variation, can be easily calculated alongside traditional measures, and are more sensitive to subtle and local LH variation. Thus, they have a greater ability to serve as predictive and diagnostic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.