ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
The Landscape of Genomic Services for Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs) Across Europe.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Diagnoses Among Congenital Anomaly Cases in Europe: Data From the EUROCAT Network.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2026Article
- Stargardt's Connected Research Network Inaugural Meeting: Landscape Review and Horizon Scanning of Stargardt Disease.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Next-Generation Sequencing for Rare Pediatric Genetic Disorders: A Single-Center Experience.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To map the existing genomic services available for patients with IRDs across Europe. Methods: A survey was conducted to 24 ophthalmic and/or genetic specialists across 19 European countries. The survey was conducted in an interview style via zoom for participants from 17 out of 19 countries. Interviewees were clinical/medical/ophthalmic geneticists, ophthalmologists/retina specialists and internal medicine specialists. The survey focused on referral pathways, genetic counseling, insurance coverage, awareness of genetic testing and counseling for IRDs among practitioners and patients, and preferred testing methodologies. Results: Genomic services (testing and counselling) for IRDs vary among countries from an awareness, availability and insurance coverage perspective. Affordability could be a barrier for patients in countries without any payment scheme (eg, Poland) and in countries where only a targeted population is covered (eg, Bulgaria). Genetic counseling via qualified genetic counsellors did not exist in many countries. The level of awareness regarding the benefits of genetic testing in IRDs among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients was perceived as low in some countries. Panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) was the first test of choice for genetic testing in 68% of the studied countries. Conclusion: There is some disparity in the approach to genetic testing for IRDs across Europe. Greater awareness of genetic testing services is required among the eye care professional community. A revised approach to the provision of genetic testing services such as centralized free genetic testing with associated interpretation and genetic counselling may help in ensuring equitable access and reimbursement, which will empower patients through improved access to clinical trials, expedite innovation, improve access to therapy and the delivery of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.