ArticleBioinformation2024
Peri-implant bone changes after using platelet-rich fibrin scaffold among Indians.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Platelet-Rich Plasma as Delivery Systems for Natural Compounds: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone transplant with osteopromotive elements - such as herbal extracts - that promote the creation of new boneis of interest to dentists. Hence, we compared the bone loss around dental implants while placing platelet rich fibrin (PRF) scaffold alone and PRF scaffold with simvastatin (SIM) and PRF scaffold with Moringaoleifera (MO). There were thirty six patients total. A total of 36 implants, or twelve implants in all three categories, were the estimated sample size. Category 1: PRF scaffolds alone. Category 2: PRF scaffolds with SIM. Category 3: PRF scaffolds with MO. Alteration in the bones were measured with CBCT. It was observed that there was decreased loss of crestal bone in PRF+ SIM and PRF+MO as compared to PRF alone. The use of herbal osteopromotive agents like simvastitin and Moringaoleifera along with PRF scaffolds can be effective in reducing bone loss around dental implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.