Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131534›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Comparison of five different obturation approaches for resistance against fracture in root canal treated teeth.

Katya Pandey, Sulaima Mehar, Nitu Chaubey, Ajeet Kumar, Rajan Kumar Jha, Sagar Hiwale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katya PandeyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, M.P., India.
Sulaima MeharDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India.
Nitu ChaubeyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences, GIDA, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ajeet KumarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India.
Rajan Kumar JhaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India.
Sagar HiwaleDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College & Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endodontist should know about the fracture resistance of endodontic treated teeth in different obturation techniques to make a proper choice for obturation of mechano-chemically prepared root canals. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically obturated teeth in five different obturation techniques namely single cone obturation (SCO), cold lateral compaction (CLC), cold free flow condensation, warm vertical compaction, injection molded thermo-plasticized technique. Among experimental categories, maximum fracture resistance was observed in cold free flow condensation technique while minimum fracture resistance was observed in injection molded thermo-plasticized technique. Cold free flow condensation technique using Gutta Flow2 has the potential to be used as obturation technique with minimum fracture resistance. Conventional techniques like CLC and SOC also offered good fracture resistance.

Indexed as

Fracture resistanceobturation techniques

Identifiers

PMID39131534
PMCPMC11312325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.