Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131458›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: Rationale for Standardized Definition and Critical Appraisal of the Literature.

Jorge Sanz-Sánchez, Mauro Chiarito, Gauravpal S Gill, Liefke C van der Heijden, Yigal Piña, Bernardo Cortese, Fernando Alfonso, Clemens von Birgelen, Jose Luis Diez Gil, Ron Waksman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Small Vessels, Big Decisions.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Definitions and standardized endpoints for the use of drug-coated balloon in coronary artery disease: consensus document of the Drug Coated Balloon Academic Research Consortium.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ultrathin-strut versus thin-strut stent healing and outcomes in preclinical and clinical subjects.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Small Coronary Vessel Size: A Great Need for a Standardized Definition.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jorge Sanz-SánchezHospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Mauro ChiaritoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Gauravpal S GillInterventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Liefke C van der HeijdenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Yigal PiñaInterventional Cardiology, National Heart Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Bernardo CorteseFondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare, Milan, Italy.
Fernando AlfonsoInterventional Cardiology, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Clemens von BirgelenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Jose Luis Diez GilHospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ron WaksmanInterventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Hector M Garcia-GarciaInterventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is present in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention according to different series, representing an unmet clinical need in light of an increased risk of technical failure, restenosis, and need for repeated revascularization. The definition of small vessel is inconsistent across trials, and no definite cutoff value has yet been determined. The lack of consensus on the definition of small vessel CAD has contributed to the high degree of heterogeneity in the safety and efficacy of the various revascularization options. Therefore, the aim of this article is to provide a critical appraisal of existing reports and to propose a reference vessel diameter of <2.5 ​mm definition of small vessel CAD to guide future clinical trials and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseasesmall vessel

Identifiers

PMID39131458
PMCPMC11307687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.