Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131453›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Prognosis of PCI in the Older Adult Population: Outcomes From the Multicenter Prospective e-ULTIMASTER Registry.

Majdi Saada, Ofer Kobo, Floris Kauer, Orazbek Sakhov, Peep Laanmets, Rajpal Abhaichand, Iñigo Lozano, Jim Crowley, Gurupreet Singh Wander, Mamas A Mamas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Majdi SaadaHillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion-Faculty of Medicine, Israel.
Ofer KoboHillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion-Faculty of Medicine, Israel.
Floris KauerDepartment of Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Orazbek SakhovDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, City Heart Center, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Peep LaanmetsDepartment of Cardiology, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.
Rajpal AbhaichandDepartment of Cardiology, L.R.G. Naidu Cardiology Research Institute and Clinic, Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Iñigo LozanoDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Cabueñes, Gijon, Spain.
Jim CrowleyGalway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Gurupreet Singh WanderHero DMC Heart Institute, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.
Ariel RoguinHillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion-Faculty of Medicine, Israel.
e-ULTIMASTER Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are usually excluded from clinical trials. This study aimed to assess 1-year clinical outcomes in patients aged >80 years. Methods: This all-comer registry included patients who underwent PCI using the Ultimaster stent. Primary clinical endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Results: In total, 3286 (8.8%) patients aged ≥80 years were compared with 33,912 patients aged <80 years. The older adult patients included more women, had more comorbidities and exhibited more complex coronary anatomy. The incidence of TLF was higher in the older adult group (5.6% vs 3.0%, Conclusion: Older adult patients had a higher incidence of TLF, CD, and TV-MI but with no difference in the incidence of recurrent revascularization or stent thrombosis. Although PCI in older adults is relatively safe, higher rates of cardiac events should be considered.

Indexed as

agecoronary artery diseaseelderlyolder adultsoutcomestentvascular disease

Identifiers

PMID39131453
PMCPMC11308062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.