ArticleJournal of medical physics
Investigating the Dosimetric Leaf Gap Correction Factor of Mobius3D Dose Calculation for Volumetric-modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing log file-based patient-specific QA for VMAT plans: A comparative study of MobiusFX and measurement-based approaches.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter for correcting radiation transmission through the round leaf end of multileaf collimators. The purpose of this study was to determine and investigate the optimal DLG correction factor for 6 MV volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan dose calculations in Mobius3D. Materials and Methods: Seventeen VMAT plans were selected for the DLG correction factor optimization process. The optimal DLG correction factor was defined as the minimum difference between the measured dose and the Mobius3D-calculated dose on the Mobius Verification Phantom™ with different DLG correction factors. Subsequently, the optimal DLG correction factor was applied for Mobius3D dose calculation, and accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and calculated doses. For verification and validation, the 17 previous plans and 10 newly selected plans underwent Mobius3D calculations with the optimal DLG correction factor, and gamma analysis was performed to compare them to the treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis was also performed between the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the TPS for cross-comparison between systems. Results: The DLG correction factor was optimized to -1.252, which reduced the average percentage differences between measured and Mobius3D-calculated doses from 2.23% ±1.21% to 0.03% ±1.82%. The cross-comparison between Mobius3D/TPS and EPID/TPS revealed a similar trend in gamma passing rate (>95%) in both the verification and validation plans. Conclusion: The DLG correction factor strongly influences the accuracy of Mobius3D-calculated doses. Applying the optimal DLG correction factor can increase dose agreement and gamma passing rate between calculation and delivered doses of VMAT plans, which emphasizes the importance of optimizing this factor during the commissioning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.