ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Synergy and antagonism in the integration of BCR and CD40 signals that control B-cell proliferation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to infection or vaccination, a successful antibody response must enrich high-affinity antigen-reactive B-cells through positive selection, but eliminate auto-reactive B-cells through negative selection. B-cells receive signals from the B-cell receptor (BCR) which binds the antigen, and the CD40 receptor which is stimulated by neighboring T-cells that also recognize the antigen. How BCR and CD40 signaling are integrated quantitatively to jointly determine B-cell fate decision and proliferation remains unclear. To investigate this, we developed a differential-equations-based model of the BCR and CD40 signaling networks activating NFκB. Our model accurately recapitulates the NFκB dynamics of B-cells stimulated through their BCR and CD40 receptors, correctly predicting that costimulation induces more NFκB activity. However, when linking it to established cell fate decision models of cell survival and cell cycle control, it predicted potentiated population expansion that was not observed experimentally. We found that this discrepancy was due to a time-dependent functional antagonism exacerbated by BCR-induced caspase activity that can trigger apoptosis in founder cells, unless NFκB-induced survival gene expression protects B-cells in time. Guided by model predictions, sequential co-stimulation experiments revealed how the temporal dynamics of BCR and CD40 signaling control the fate decision between negative and positive selection of B-cell clonal expansion. Our quantitative findings highlight a complex non-monotonic integration of BCR and CD40 signals that is controlled by a balance between NFκB and cell-death pathways, and suggest a mechanism for regulating the stringency of B-cell selection during an antibody response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.