Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39131297›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Cortical Acetylcholine Response to Deep Brain Stimulation of the Basal Forebrain.

Khadijah Shanazz, Kun Xie, Tucker Oliver, Jamal Bogan, Fernando Vale, Jeremy Sword, Sergei A Kirov, Alvin Terry, Philip O'Herron, David T Blake

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Khadijah ShanazzDept of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-0493
Kun XieDept of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Tucker OliverDept of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Jamal BoganDept of Science and Mathematics, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Fernando ValeDept of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Jeremy SwordDept of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Sergei A KirovDept of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Alvin TerryDept of Pharmacology and Toxicology , Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Philip O'HerronDept of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
David T BlakeDept of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.

Funding

Primate model of deep brain stimulation for Alzheimers and age-related cognitivedeclineRF1AG060754 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BLAKE, DAVID T, CONSTANTINIDIS, CHRISTOS · 2019 to 2019
$3.9M
Synaptic Circuitry in StrokeR01NS083858 · NINDS · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI KIROV, SERGEI A · 2014 to 2022
$2.7M
Uncovering the physiological role of functional hyperemiaR01NS126920 · NINDS · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI Philip O'Herron · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG060754NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083858NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS), the direct electrical stimulation of neuronal tissue in the basal forebrain to enhance release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, is under consideration as a method to improve executive function in patients with dementia. While some small studies indicate a positive response in the clinical setting, the relationship between DBS and acetylcholine pharmacokinetics is incompletely understood. Objective: We examined the cortical acetylcholine response to different stimulation parameters of the basal forebrain. Methods: 2-photon imaging was combined with deep brain stimulation. Stimulating electrodes were implanted in the subpallidal basal forebrain, and the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex was imaged. Acetylcholine activity was determined using the GRAB Results: Experiments manipulating pulse train frequency demonstrated that integrated acetylcholine induced fluorescence was insensitive to frequency, and that peak levels were achieved with frequencies from 60 to 130 Hz. Altering pulse train length indicated that longer stimulation resulted in higher peaks and more activation with sublinear summation. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil increased the peak response to 10s of stimulation at 60Hz, and the integrated response increased 57% with the 2 mg/kg dose, and 126% with the 4 mg/kg dose. Acetylcholine levels returned to baseline with a time constant of 14 to 18 seconds in all experiments. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that acetylcholine receptor activation is insensitive to frequency between 60 and 130 Hz. High peak responses are achieved with up to 900 pulses. Donepezil increases total acetylcholine receptor activation associated with DBS but did not change temporal kinetics. The long time constants observed in the cerebral cortex add to the evidence supporting volume in addition to synaptic transmission.

Indexed as

2-photon in vivo imagingacetylcholinebasal forebraindeep brain stimulationdonepezilGRAB ACH 3.0

Identifiers

PMID39131297
PMCPMC11312592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.