ArticleTransplantation direct2024
Training the Next Generation of Transplant Surgeons With a 3-Dimensional Trainer: A Pilot Study.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Living Donor Training During ASTS Fellowship: Disparities in Autonomy Between Kidney and Liver Donation. A National Survey.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the United States, no published guidelines promote exposure to technical variants (ie, living donor or split liver) during transplant fellowship. Simulation with hands-on liver models may improve training in transplantation. This pilot study addressed 3 overall goals (material and model creation tools, recruitment rates and assessment of workload, and protocol adherence). Methods: A patient-specific hands-on liver model was constructed from clinical imaging, and it needed to be resilient and realistic. Multiple types of materials were tested between January 2020 and August 2022. Participants were recruited stepwise. A left lateral segmentectomy simulation was conducted between August 2022 and December 2022 to assess protocol adherence. Results: Digital anatomy 3-dimensional printing was considered the best option for the hands-on liver model. The recruitment rate was 100% and 47% for junior attendings and surgical residents, respectively. Ten participants were included and completed all the required surveys. Seven (70%) and 6 (60%) participants "agreed" that the overall quality of the model and the material were acceptable for surgical simulation. Five participants (50%) "agreed" that the training improved their surgical skills. Nine participants (90%) "strongly agreed" that similar sessions should be included in surgical training programs. Conclusions: Three-dimensional hands-on liver models have the advantage of tactile feedback and were rated favorably as a potential training tool. Study enrollment for further studies is possible with the support of leadership. Rigorous multicenter designs should be developed to measure the actual impact of 3-dimensional hands-on liver models on surgical training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.