ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2024
Utility of Artificial Intelligence Plaque Quantification: Results of the DECODE Study.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Vascular Immunometabolism in Atherosclerosis: Emerging Roles of Glycometabolic Reprogramming in Immune and Vascular Cells.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Non-calcified plaque volume assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography: prognostic significance, reproducibility, and temporal progression.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography angiography quantification of atherosclerosis burden: comparison with intravascular ultrasound in the INVICTUS Registry.European radiology · 2026Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography and Artificial Intelligence-based Plaque Analysis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled coronary plaque quantification for personalized risk assessment and lipid-lowering therapy: Insights from the FISH&CHIPS studyAmerican journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Plaque Progression and Rupture in Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Review of Current Imaging Modalities.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Innovations In Artificial Intelligence-Guided Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Imaging: From Detection to Prognosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Plaque Characterization: Clinical Implications, Evidence Gaps, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Computed Tomography and Coronary Plaque Analysis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Coronary Calcium Scoring Using True and Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions on Photon-Counting CT with Differing Slice Increment: Impact on Calcium Severity Classifications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Imaging for Personalized Management of Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Future Horizons: The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial Intelligence Plaque Analysis (AI-QCPA, HeartFlow) provides, from a CCTA, quantitative plaque burden information including total plaque and plaque subtype volumes. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of AI-QCPA in clinical decision making. Methods: One hundred cases were reviewed by 3 highly experienced practicing cardiologists who are SCCT level 3 CCTA readers. Patients had varying levels of calcium (median CACS: 99.5) and CAD-RADS scores. Initial management plan for each case was a majority decision based upon patient demographics, clinical history, and CCTA report. AI-QCPA was then provided for each patient, and the plan was reconsidered. The primary endpoint was the reclassification rate (RR). In a secondary analysis of 40 cases, the above process was repeated but the initial plan was based upon review of the actual CCTA images. Results: RR following AI-QCPA review was 66% (66/100) of cases (95% CI, 56.72%-75.28%). RR ranged from 47% in cases with CACS 0 to 96% in cases with CACS >400, and from 40% in CAD-RADS 1 cases to 94% in CAD-RADS 4 cases. RR was higher in cases with coronary stenoses ≥50% (89.5%) vs cases with stenoses <50% (51.6%). RR was 39% in cases with LDL <70 mg/dL vs 70% in LDL ≥70 mg/dL. Following review of the CCTA images rather than the CCTA report, the RR was 50% (95% CI of 34.51% - 65.49%). The primary reclassification effect was to intensify preventative medical therapy. Conclusions: Adding AI-QCPA to CCTA alone leads to a change in clinical care in two-thirds of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.