ArticleGastro hep advances2022
A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Causal Monogenic Variants in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpreting human genetic variation at atomic resolution.Nature genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: Diagnosis of monogenic disease is increasingly important for patient care and personalizing therapy. However, the current process is nonstandardized, expensive, and time consuming. There is currently no accepted strategy to help identify disease-causing variants in monogenic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of the study is to develop a prioritization strategy for monogenic IBD variant discovery through detailed analysis of a whole-exome sequencing (WES) data set. Methods: All consenting pediatric patients with IBD presenting to our tertiary care hospital during the study period were enrolled and underwent WES (n = 1005). Available family members also underwent WES. Variants were analyzed en masse using the GEMINI framework and were further annotated using data from dbNSFP, Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion, and gnomAD. Known disease-causing variants (n = 36) were used as positive controls. Machine learning algorithms were optimized and then compared to assist with identifying monogenic IBD case characteristics. Results: Initial gene-level analysis identified 11 genes not previously linked to IBD that could potentially harbor IBD-causing variants. Machine learning algorithms identified 4 primary variant characteristics (Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion score, dbNSFP score, relationship with a known immunodeficiency gene, and alternate allele frequency), and optimal threshold values for each were determined to assist with identifying monogenic IBD variants. Based on these characteristics, an automated variant prioritization pipeline was then created that filters and prioritizes variants from >100,000 variants per patient down to a mean of 15. This pipeline is available online for all to use. Conclusion: Leveraging a large WES data set, we demonstrate a statistically rigorous strategy for prioritization of variants for monogenic IBD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.