ArticleCureus2024
Augmented Reality-Guided External Ventricular Drain Placement: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing augmented reality-assisted and freehand external ventricular drain placement: a multicenter randomized controlled crossover phantom study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Trial
- Augmented reality for external ventricular drain placement: Model alignment and integration software.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a critical neurosurgical procedure used to relieve intracranial pressure in patients with conditions such as hydrocephalus, traumatic brain injury, and intracranial hemorrhage. Traditional methods rely heavily on anatomical landmarks and the surgeon's experience, which can lead to variability in outcomes and increased risk of complications. Neuronavigation, while available, is infrequently used due to the size, cost, and set-up times associated with these devices. This report explores the use of a headset-based augmented reality (AR) system for guidance during the EVD placement procedure. We describe an AR system that overlays a 3D model of the patient's cranial anatomy, derived from preoperative imaging, onto the patient's head. This system is a head-mounted display and utilizes a rapid fiducial-less registration to provide the surgeon with visualization of 3D anatomy, and targeted trajectories. The system was used with a 32-year-old patient undergoing EVD placement prior to a cranioplasty. Due to the atypical cranial anatomy and due to prior procedures and midline shift, this relatively high-risk catheter placement was an ideal circumstance for the use of AR guidance during the EVD placement. This report described an early use of AR for EVD placement and represents a substantial advancement in neurosurgical practice, offering enhanced precision, efficiency, and safety. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the broader applicability of AR in other neurosurgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.