ArticleCureus2024
Developing Causality and Severity Assessment Frameworks for Food Safety Signals Using Social Media Reviews: A Technical Report Based on Data From an Urban Indian Suburb.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media reviews are a valuable data source, reflecting consumer experiences and interactions with businesses. This study leverages such data to develop a passive surveillance framework for food safety in urban India. By employing a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-powered Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis tool, branded as Eat At Right Place (ERP), the study analyses over 100,000 reviews from 93 restaurants to identify and assess food safety signals. The Causality Assessment Index (CAI) and Severity Assessment Score (SAS) are introduced to systematically evaluate potential risks. The CAI uses pattern recognition and temporal relationships to establish causality while the SAS quantifies severity based on sub-aspects such as cleanliness, food handling, and unintended health outcomes. Results indicate that 40% of the restaurants had a CAI above 1, highlighting significant food safety concerns. The framework successfully prioritizes corrective actions by grading the severity of issues, demonstrating its potential for real-time food safety management. This study underscores the importance of integrating innovative data-driven approaches into public health monitoring systems and suggests future improvements in natural language processing algorithms and data source expansion. The findings pave the way for enhanced food safety surveillance and timely regulatory interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.