ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Professionalism among Postgraduate Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study from Patna, Bihar.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProfessionalism is a core quality which has to be developed and imbibed by medical students. However, training in professionalism was not a part of the medical curriculum until recently when the Competency-Based Medical Education system was introduced for undergraduate medical students in India, by the National Medical Commission. However, there has been no formal training on professionalism, in the curriculum of postgraduate (PG) medical students in India. Therefore, in this study, we have done a quantitative assessment of the attitude towards professionalism among PG medical students. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 PG medical students of an autonomous institute in Patna, Bihar over a period of six months using the Learners' Attitudes on Medical Professionalism Scale (LAMPS) questionnaire. Data entry was done on Microsft Excel 2015 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) and data analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States).
resultsOut of 200 study subjects, 55% (n=110) were PG students from clinical departments and 45% (n=90) were from pre-clinical and para-clinical departments; 25.5% (n=51) of them were from first year, 57% (n=114) of them were from second year, and 17.5% (n=35) were from third year PG training. The overall mean score for the LAMPS scale across all domains was found to be 2.78±0.178 (mean±S.D). Clinical PG students (2.99 ± 0.217) received significantly higher scores than pre/paraclinical PG students (2.68 ± 0.176) (T-test value = 10.9262, p < 0.0001).
conclusionThis study highlights the disparity in professionalism scores between clinical and pre/para-clinical students, suggesting a tailored approach might be beneficial. In order to improve the attitude towards professionalism, structured courses/workshops should be inculcated into the PG training curriculum. Continuous evaluation of professionalism throughout medical training can lead to better preparedness for future professional roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.