ReviewCureus2024
Skin and Muscle Closure Techniques Following Large-Scale Osteosarcoma Removal: A Comparative Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent form of bone cancer, typically arises in osteoblast cells responsible for generating new bone. The bone produced by these cancer cells is weaker compared to healthy bone. OS is an aggressive bone cancer that often requires extensive resection, leaving behind substantial soft tissue defects. Successful closure after tumor excision is critical for wound healing and postoperative recovery. However, the optimal approach varies depending on factors like defect size and location. After extensive resection of OS, restoring the integrity of the affected area demands careful closure of both the skin and underlying muscle. The appropriate closure technique depends on the size and location of the soft tissue defect. The main objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare different surgical techniques for closing skin and muscle layers following large-scale OS removal. Through a systematic review methodology, we conducted an extensive analysis of the existing body of literature on this topic, drawing from relevant research papers published over the past two decades. This allowed us to collectively evaluate and synthesize available data on the subject. This review found that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and flap reconstruction are the main surgical approaches used to close skin and muscle following extensive OS resection, which commonly results in large soft tissue defects due to the nature of tumor removal. Furthermore, NPWT was the most widely used method for closing soft tissue defects after major OS removal, while flap reconstruction was also common when NPWT was not appropriate or the defect was too large. An integrated approach combining vacuum therapy, skin stretching, and occasional flaps seeks to primarily close large defects after OS resection through optimized healing and tension reduction to achieve the best postoperative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.