Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130915›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Skin and Muscle Closure Techniques Following Large-Scale Osteosarcoma Removal: A Comparative Analysis.

Christopher R Meretsky, Brandon Krumbach, Jay Popovich, Mohammed Ajebli, Anthony T Schiuma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher R MeretskySurgery, St. George's University School of Medicine, Great River, USA.
Brandon KrumbachAnatomy, St. George's University, Great River, USA.
Jay PopovichInternal Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, Great River, USA.
Mohammed AjebliBiology Sciences, Moulay Ismail University, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Errachidia, MAR.
Anthony T SchiumaOrthopedic Surgery, Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent form of bone cancer, typically arises in osteoblast cells responsible for generating new bone. The bone produced by these cancer cells is weaker compared to healthy bone. OS is an aggressive bone cancer that often requires extensive resection, leaving behind substantial soft tissue defects. Successful closure after tumor excision is critical for wound healing and postoperative recovery. However, the optimal approach varies depending on factors like defect size and location. After extensive resection of OS, restoring the integrity of the affected area demands careful closure of both the skin and underlying muscle. The appropriate closure technique depends on the size and location of the soft tissue defect. The main objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare different surgical techniques for closing skin and muscle layers following large-scale OS removal. Through a systematic review methodology, we conducted an extensive analysis of the existing body of literature on this topic, drawing from relevant research papers published over the past two decades. This allowed us to collectively evaluate and synthesize available data on the subject. This review found that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and flap reconstruction are the main surgical approaches used to close skin and muscle following extensive OS resection, which commonly results in large soft tissue defects due to the nature of tumor removal. Furthermore, NPWT was the most widely used method for closing soft tissue defects after major OS removal, while flap reconstruction was also common when NPWT was not appropriate or the defect was too large. An integrated approach combining vacuum therapy, skin stretching, and occasional flaps seeks to primarily close large defects after OS resection through optimized healing and tension reduction to achieve the best postoperative results.

Indexed as

flap reconstructionnegative-pressure wound therapyosteosarcomaskin and muscle closurewound closure

Identifiers

PMID39130915
PMCPMC11315368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.