ArticleCureus2024
Feasibility and Effectiveness of the Implementation of Anxiety Screening for Adolescents in a Primary Care Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network analysis of depression, anxiety, and NSSI symptoms in adolescents: a clinical sample study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended routine anxiety screening for children and adolescents in 2022. This study describes the feasibility of routine anxiety screening in a primary care practice. It further examines the effects of routine anxiety screening on anxiety diagnoses and provider behavior in a setting in which anxiety screening was implemented five years in advance of the national guidelines. During the first year of implementation, approximately 80% of patients were screened, and 17% of screens were positive. A retrospective chart review of patients with positive screens found that the majority of positive screens led to a new diagnosis of anxiety and that half of newly diagnosed patients were prescribed an intervention. Screening was associated with an increase in diagnoses of anxiety disorders in the studied population from 9.6% to 13.3% (p<0.0001). Following the initial implementation, screening rates continued to rise, with an eventual plateau of >90%. Anxiety screening in the pediatric primary care setting is feasible and sustainable and led to increased provider recognition of anxiety and meaningful clinical action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.