Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130840›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Malignant Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast With Rhabdomyosarcomatous Differentiation: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Joshua Neposlan, Emily A Goebel, Michael Lock, Robert Dinniwell, Vivian S Tan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua NeposlanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Emily A GoebelDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, CAN.
Michael LockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, CAN.
Robert DinniwellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Niagara Health, St. Catharines, CAN.
Vivian S TanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phyllodes tumor (PT) is a rare fibroepithelial breast neoplasm that is typically graded histopathologically as benign, borderline, and malignant. Malignant PTs (MPTs) exhibit marked stromal cellularity, atypia, overgrowth, increased mitotic activity, and the propensity to metastasize. MPTs represent 10%-15% of all PT cases and often have a notably aggressive disease course. Infrequently, these tumors contain heterologous histological elements, including liposarcoma and fibrosarcoma, among others. Rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation is an exceptionally rare example of such variation. This report documents the clinical presentation and disease course of a 62-year-old woman diagnosed with MPT with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation, just the seventh such confirmed case in the English literature. The patient experienced an arduous disease course, developing metastases to her lungs and axial skeleton just months after her initial diagnosis. Palliative radiation and chemotherapy were initiated, but the patient unfortunately succumbed to her disease just 10 months after the initial diagnosis. This case adds to the scarce literature surrounding the rare development of a heterologous rhabdomyosarcomatous element in an MPT, as well as the decision-making process surrounding the use of radiation to treat such lesions. The details discussed in this paper may inform future approaches for patients diagnosed with this disease.

Indexed as

breastcase reportmalignant phyllodes tumorradiationrhabdomyosarcomatous

Identifiers

PMID39130840
PMCPMC11316852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.