ArticleCureus2024
Refining Cardiovascular Calcification in the Appraisal of Ischemic Heart.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEven in asymptomatic patients, there is a high association of ischemia on myocardial perfusion scans in those with coronary artery calcification or valvular calcifications. Patients without coronary artery calcifications have exceeding-low rates of cardiovascular events. The absence of cardiovascular calcification, including coronary artery, valvular, and thoracic aorta is a strong negative predictor of myocardial ischemia. In individuals with suspected ischemia who had chest computed tomography imaging, evaluation for cardiovascular calcification (coronary artery, valves, and thoracic aorta) is an invaluable tool to guide management for further diagnostic imaging. We hypothesize that the complete absence of cardiovascular calcification has a high negative predictive value for defects in myocardial perfusion imaging such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET).
methodsNon-contrast computed tomography performed for SPECT/PET CT attenuation correction from March 1, 2017, to September 30, 2017, were retrospectively reviewed for the absence of cardiovascular calcification by a cardiologist and radiologist who were blinded to patients' medical history. Medical records were reviewed to include patient demographics and medical history. A total of 132 patients were analyzed.
resultsOf the 132 patients without calcifications, seven patients had small myocardial perfusion defects suggestive of ischemia or infarct, but none were considered significant defects. Of these seven patients, six were managed medically and one was from an outside institution with no follow-up data. Two of the seven patients had follow-up invasive angiography or coronary CTA that did not show significant atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.
conclusionA complete absence of cardiovascular calcification indicates a 100% negative predictive value for a significant perfusion defect on same-day confirmatory nuclear stress testing. Patients with suspected ischemia but absent cardiovascular calcifications can be safely managed medically without further testing for ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.