ArticleCureus2024
The Utility and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients Diagnosed With Cervical Cystic Lesions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis observation study aimed to differentiate between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) and gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (GAS) while evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical cystic lesions. METHOD AND MATERIAL: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic process and laparoscopic surgical management of cervical cystic lesions suspected to be LEGH or GAS. Preoperatively and postoperatively, MRI, cytology, histology, tumor marker analysis, and surgical outcomes (blood loss during surgery, operative time) were assessed. Six individuals were selected based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results indicating a preoperative suspicion of LEGH or GAS. These patients underwent laparoscopic surgical treatment without indications of malignancy based on preoperative histology or cytology.
resultsInitially, all individuals were suspected to have LEGH based on MRI findings. Postoperatively, two patients were diagnosed with LEGH, two with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA), and two showed no notable findings on pathology (one diagnosed endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial tissue). Patients with malignancies exhibited longer surgical times and higher intraoperative blood loss. Preoperatively, no significant variation was observed in maximal lesion diameter between adenocarcinoma and LEGH. However, lesion diameter increased significantly over time in patients with GAS.
conclusionLaparoscopic surgery demonstrated feasibility and provided crucial diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes, with no postoperative recurrence observed in cases of malignancy, despite the challenges associated with preoperative differentiation. These findings underscore the potential of laparoscopic surgery in enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy for cervical cystic lesions, offering promise for improved patient outcomes and management strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.